SEATTLE (AP) — The clock ran down on the finish of the homecoming recreation and spectators stormed the soccer subject, knocking over members of the highschool band — all to assemble round an assistant coach as he took a knee in prayer, surrounded by uniformed gamers.
Six years later, after dropping his teaching job and repeatedly dropping in courtroom, that former Washington state coach, Joe Kennedy, will take his arguments earlier than the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, saying the Bremerton School District violated his First Amendment rights by refusing to let him proceed praying at midfield instantly after video games. Four conservative justices have already expressed issues with how his case has been dealt with.
Kennedy’s effort to get his job again helped earn him an look at a 2016 Donald Trump rally and shortly turned a cultural touchstone, pitting public college workers’ spiritual liberties towards what his critics describe as longstanding rules separating church and state and defending college students from spiritual coercion.
People are additionally studying…
Lawyers for the college district say officers had no downside letting Kennedy pray individually from college students or letting him return to the sector to wish after the scholars left. But permitting him to wish at midfield instantly after video games with college students there risked being seen as authorities endorsement of faith.
While Kennedy insists he by no means cared whether or not college students participated within the prayers and he by no means requested them to affix him, not less than one participant — anonymously — later reported taking part opposite to his personal beliefs, for worry of dropping enjoying time.
“This case is challenging well-established case law that has protected students’ religious freedom for decades, and that has been supported by conservative and liberal justices alike,” mentioned Rachel Laser, chief government of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which is representing the college district. “If the court rules the wrong way, teachers and coaches could pressure students to pray in every public school classroom across the country.”
For Kennedy’s supporters, the ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ holding within the case would drive public college workers to drop their spiritual identities on the schoolhouse door — one thing they are saying the Constitution doesn’t require.
“If a teacher prays over her lunch in the cafeteria and students can see her — just that little blessing over her salad — that’s enough to terminate that teacher, according to the school district,” said Jeremy Dys, an attorney with First Liberty Institute, which is representing Kennedy.
Kennedy, a former Marine whose day job was at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, began coaching football at Bremerton High in 2008. He was new to religion and coaching, and said he was inspired by the movie “Facing the Giants” — a few Christian highschool soccer coach — to provide due to God “on the battlefield” after every recreation.
What began as a solitary practice soon attracted students. He agreed, citing the district’s policy of neither encouraging nor discouraging student prayer. Over the years he began leading locker room prayers before games, as well as group prayers and religious motivational talks at midfield after them.
The school district said it did not learn Kennedy was leading players in prayer until it heard it from another team’s coach in September 2015. Administrators told him he was not to participate in religious activities with students, and any of his own religious observation must be either non-demonstrative or should occur without students.
For a month, Kennedy complied, the district notes in arguments to the court: He prayed on his own, such as while students were singing the fight song, and the district let him be.
But Kennedy’s lawyers then insisted he be allowed to resume his prior practice, describing it as a “personal” prayer protected by the Constitution whether or not students joined him. Kennedy announced he would resume praying at midfield after games, and when he did so at the Oct. 16, 2015, homecoming game, as Bremerton’s players were otherwise occupied, spectators rushed to field to join him — as did members of the opposing team.
The district still did not fire Kennedy, but wrote to caution him. Given his prior statements and actions, his praying at midfield — on government property he could access only by virtue of his job — could be perceived as school endorsement of religion, exposing the district to potential liability, Superintendent Aaron Leavell wrote.
“I wish to again emphasize that the district does not prohibit prayer or other religious exercise by its employees,” Leavell wrote. “However, it must prohibit any conduct by its employees that would serve as District endorsement of religion.”
Kennedy prayed again on the field after the next two games: first at a varsity game where no one joined him, and then at a junior varsity game where he was joined by a state lawmaker. The district then placed him on leave, and his contract was not renewed.
Kennedy’s lawyers point out that he stopped engaging in religious activity with Bremerton students when asked. What he was actually suspended for was not delivering prayers to students, but kneeling and praying quickly by himself, they argue.
The federal judge who ruled against Kennedy, District Judge Ronald Leighton, compared his postgame behavior to a director who comes to center stage and prays at the end of a school play: “A reasonable onlooker would interpret their speech from that location as an extension of the school-sanctioned speech just before it.”
As the case made its way through the courts, Kennedy lost at every turn. But when the Supreme Court declined to take the case at an earlier stage, Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh called the 9th Circuit’s reasoning “troubling” and said under it, “public school teachers and coaches may be fired if they engage in any expression that the school does not like while they are on duty.”
Ninth Circuit Judge Milan Smith suggested a teacher who prays over lunch in a cafeteria doesn’t send a public message the way Kennedy did. Smith called the narrative posed by Kennedy’s lawyers — that this was about a public employee’s private prayer — “deceitful.”
Kennedy said he just wants to get back to coaching.
“This thing has just been so blown out of proportion,” he said. “Imagine a guy going out there and tying his shoe — you would never know the difference.”
Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This materials might not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.